A) Briefly explain ONE major difference between McPherson's and Horwitz's historical interpretation of the Civil War.

McPherson's interpretation of the Civil War is more in line with the traditional reasoning that we see about the conflict - that it was inevitable, and that the war in the end benefited the Nation. Horowitz, however, sees the ware as more of a product of cultural differences, as the South's effort to assert itself.

College boring?