Ask Question
29 March, 06:20

If you were in a role of a decision maker, how might you balance your desire to protect biodiversity around the world with the high cost of preserving biodiversity in any given location?

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 29 March, 06:42
    0
    I would try to balance by trying to make major awareness campaigns to encourage people to adopt biodiversity preservation techniques. In these campaigns, I would warn that the costs of preserving biodiversity are high, but the costs to offset the decline in biodiversity will be much higher.

    Explanation:

    Saving biodiversity will be expensive: $ 300 billion a year over the next eight years, according to Brazilian Bráulio Dias, secretary of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity. Failure to preserve biodiversity would cost much more and could have serious consequences, such as disease, hunger, poverty and poor adaptability to climate change.

    This fact has to be disseminated so that people around the world can realize the imminent need to adopt nature preservation methods. For this reason, in order to balance my desire to protect biodiversity worldwide with the high cost of preserving biodiversity anywhere, I would start large campaigns warning people of the imminent danger of not engaging in behaviors that encourage biodiversity preservation.
  2. 29 March, 07:34
    0
    The answer is On the off chance that I were in the job of the chief, how I would adjust my craving to ensure the biodiversity around the globe with the mind-boggling expense of safeguarding biodiversity in some random area by concentrating more on directing human exercises.

    Explanation:

    On the off chance that I were in the job of the leader, how I would adjust my craving to secure the biodiversity around the globe with the mind-boggling expense of safeguarding biodiversity in some random area by concentrating more on controlling human exercises. The reason we have declining biodiversity in any case is that human effect is extraordinarily influencing the species that live in these problem areas, so controlling what people do to reduce the contrary effects appears the most sensible. Maintainability is imperative for the safeguarding of the well being of nature. Since this is a battle about land and who gets it, it is significant to transform these hot-spots into ensured regions that still have a capacity in an industrialist society, for example, a vacation destination or an investigations save to enable species to recuperate.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “If you were in a role of a decision maker, how might you balance your desire to protect biodiversity around the world with the high cost of ...” in 📘 Advanced Placement (AP) if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers