Ask Question
23 July, 04:31

Although American artists are largely protected from direct censorship by the US Constitution's first amendment, government funding is subject to approval by local and national legislators who sometimes balk at funding the world of certain artistsa. trueb. false

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 23 July, 06:59
    0
    Answer: True

    Explanation:

    The 1st amendment protects and endows a citizen with free spech and freedom of expression, any act against this right is considered illegal. Funding of an artist's work can be cut however, and this act on itself is not considered illegal. An artist for example may produce erotic artwork that a local legislator may find offensive and as such refuse to provide funding or a platform that would allow the artist to express or show his or her work, which some would consider is a form of censorship.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Although American artists are largely protected from direct censorship by the US Constitution's first amendment, government funding is ...” in 📘 Arts if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers