Ask Question
7 February, 10:27

Paulo makes the argument that the asteroid strike that likely contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs was a short-tem environmental change because it happened so quickly. Which is the best analysis of Paulo's position? He is correct; it happened in just a few seconds. He is correct; it did not cause any long-term changes. He is incorrect; it caused long-term changes. He is incorrect; impacts are not environmental changes.

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 7 February, 13:26
    0
    He is incorrect because there are long term changes such as dionsoaurs died of mailny from it some scitentist say but for quick I say its c.
  2. 7 February, 14:25
    0
    D: He is incorrect, the impact caused long term changes
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Paulo makes the argument that the asteroid strike that likely contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs was a short-tem environmental ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers