Ask Question
17 April, 17:48

Why is dna evidence more conclusive in proving a person's innocence rather than proving his/her guilt?

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 17 April, 18:32
    0
    A comprehensive match requires sequencing the entire genome; disporiving a match just requires finding any discrepancies at all. In other words, as soon as you find something different, you have proven innocent. To prove guilt you have to go all the way through.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why is dna evidence more conclusive in proving a person's innocence rather than proving his/her guilt? ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers