Ask Question
14 March, 08:40

Natural selection suggests that creatures with mutations disadvantageous to survival will not live to reproduce, yet there are examples, such as albino animals, found occasionally. Do these exceptions discredit natural selection? Explain your answer.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 14 March, 12:22
    0
    Answer: No

    Explanation: It is beneficial if the animals that are disadvantageous doesn't reproduce so it doesn't discredit natural selection. The traits in which variation is occured are more suitable for organism to live and reproduce in the environment are preserved and are passed from generation to generation.

    However, natural selection effects limited number of progeny.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Natural selection suggests that creatures with mutations disadvantageous to survival will not live to reproduce, yet there are examples, ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers