Ask Question
28 September, 12:38

W1 should not have fluoresced. Why? (I know it did not contain rGFP, but why?) W2-W4 should have fluoresced slightly. Give two possible reasons why. (Yes, I know it contained GFP ... but why?)

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 28 September, 13:35
    0
    Because of the present of GFP, and GFP activities.

    Explanation:

    GFP plays an important role in which there is fluorescence or not.

    W1 does not have fluorescence because it might not be inherited from its parents, or there is a mutation which inactivates or deletes or malfunctions the GFP.

    W2-W4 manifest fluorescence because of GFP undoubtedly, actually functioned GFP. With the shortage information you have provided in the question, I could only say that GFP in W2-W4 is inherited from their parents and it works.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “W1 should not have fluoresced. Why? (I know it did not contain rGFP, but why?) W2-W4 should have fluoresced slightly. Give two possible ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers