Ask Question
24 February, 01:04

A scientist discovers a unicellular organism when examining a pond sample under a microscope. Which of the following explanations would provide a correct claim with supporting evidence to determine to which kingdom the organism would belong?

Claim: The organism is a protist.

Evidence: The organism is unicellular, prokaryotic, and lives in a moist environment.

Claim: The organism is a protist.

Evidence: The organism is multicellular, eukaryotic, and reproduces by binary fission

Claim: The organism is a bacteria cell.

Evidence: The organism is unicellular, eukaryotic, and is found in a moist environment.

Claim: The organism is a bacteria cell.

Evidence: The organism is unicellular, prokaryotic, and reproduces by binary fission.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 24 February, 02:50
    0
    Claim: The organism is a bacterial cell.

    Evidence: The organism is unicellular, prokaryotic, and reproduces by binary fission.

    Explanation:

    The organism cannot be a protist based on the evidence. Protists are unicelluar, eukaryotic, and live in a moist environment. Binary fission is the primary way that prokaryotic cells reproduce, so that does not apply to protists.

    The organism is a bacterial cell, but bacterial cells are prokaryotic, not eukaryotic. They can be found in moist environments but that is not a defining factor of bacteria, like it is for protists. Bacterial cells are unicellular.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A scientist discovers a unicellular organism when examining a pond sample under a microscope. Which of the following explanations would ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers