Ask Question
15 August, 18:49

Which of the following is NOT an argument used in favor of genectically modified food?

(A) It is a logical extension of selective breeding.

(B) The food produced from genetic engineering processes is safe to eat.

(C) The genetic engineering process yields the same amount of food in less favorable climates.

(D) All of these arguments are used.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 15 August, 20:49
    0
    Answer: D.

    Explanation:

    - A: Genetically Modified Food or Organisms (GMO's) can be considered as the use of selective breeding, which has been traditionally used by humans to get the desired features on a specific organism.

    - B: It is safe to eat. There are arguments that it is not safe, but there is no evidence that it isn't.

    - C: The Engineering Process can not only improve the organism's adaptability to different environments, but can also improve the yield of a crop or organism.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following is NOT an argument used in favor of genectically modified food? (A) It is a logical extension of selective breeding. ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers