A car tire company is testing a new tire that they promote as having improved speeds under wet conditions. An experiment was performed on a wet, closed, half-mile track using the same car and driver. Two trials were performed, one with standard tires and one with the new WetMax tires. What can be concluded about the claims of the tire company? A) There is no hypothesis provided. B) The hypothesis of the company is refuted. C) The hypothesis of the company is verified. D) The hypothesis was neither verified or refuted.

Question

Biology

Muhammad Neal

9 February, 02:35

A car tire company is testing a new tire that they promote as having improved speeds under wet conditions. An experiment was performed on a wet, closed, half-mile track using the same car and driver. Two trials were performed, one with standard tires and one with the new WetMax tires. What can be concluded about the claims of the tire company? A) There is no hypothesis provided. B) The hypothesis of the company is refuted. C) The hypothesis of the company is verified. D) The hypothesis was neither verified or refuted.

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Julian Pennington · Answer 1

My answer will be option D (The hypothesis was neither verified or refuted) because the results of the two tests carried out with standard tires and with the new WetMax tires are not reported. More information is missing to analyze the results and draw conclusions.

Luz · Answer 2

The answer is C) The hypothesis of the company is verified