Ask Question
15 July, 17:37

Why should/shouldn't Pluto be reclassified as a planet?

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 15 July, 17:48
    0
    (This could be opinion based, but ok.)

    Explanation:

    should:Pluto was known as a planet for 75 years. This means that most people already knew it as a planet, and would be extremely confused. All of the books about planets would be inaccurate and changed. Not all people can access brand new books, leading to inaccurate information.

    shouldn't: The same reason that it was unclassified as a planet. It does not adhere to all of the rules of being a planet. It is not completely round and does not have a round orbit around the sun. Pluto does not have every requirement to be a real planet, and therefor, it would be incorrect to have it classified wrongly.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why should/shouldn't Pluto be reclassified as a planet? ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers