Ask Question
11 October, 07:43

A case-control study was conducted to assess whether occupational radiation exposure among men was associated with Down syndrome in their children. The investigators matched cases and controls on age of the mother at childbirth by 5-year categories.

1. When possible, information on paternal radiation exposure was taken from employment records rather than from subject interviews. Why was this done?

O To minimize recall bias of exposure

O To minimize detection bias for cases

O To minimize differential misclassification of exposure

O To remove selection bias of non-radiation exposed fathers

O To provide dose-response information

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 11 October, 09:31
    0
    Option A, To minimize recall bias of exposure

    Explanation:

    In a case control study, two group as are studied and compared on the basis of some supposed causal attribute

    In this case the supposed causal attribute is association of down syndrome in children with the occupational radiation exposure of their fathers.

    If the parents are interviewed about their history of occupational radiation exposure, there are high chances of them making mistakes while recalling.

    Hence, instead of interview paternal radiation exposure was taken from employment records

    Hence, option A is correct
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A case-control study was conducted to assess whether occupational radiation exposure among men was associated with Down syndrome in their ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers