Ask Question
24 June, 18:53

Two scientists are observing a group of children eating at snack time. After watching the children, Scientist A says the children eat because they are hungry. Scientist B says the children eat because their friends are eating. Which scientist's conclusion is valid? A. Scientist B's conclusion is valid because it is supported by evidence. B. Neither conclusion is valid. Conclusions cannot be drawn from observations. C. Scientist A's conclusion is valid because eating is necessary to stay healthy. D. Both scientists' conclusions could be valid.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 24 June, 19:03
    0
    D. Both scientists' conclusions could be valid.

    Explanation:

    D is correct because there is not enough information provided to draw an exact conclusion from the observations.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Two scientists are observing a group of children eating at snack time. After watching the children, Scientist A says the children eat ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers