Ask Question
13 September, 00:18

Which is more harmful primary or secondary pollutants

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 13 September, 01:14
    0
    Answer: Primary pollutants and secondary pollutants can be more dangerous.

    Explanation: The first are those that are emitted directly from a source, which can be natural (volcanic eruptions or fires, for example) or of anthropogenic origin (carbon monoxide from vehicles). Secondary pollutants, on the other hand, are not emitted directly.
  2. 13 September, 04:16
    0
    secondary pollutants

    Explanation:

    Primary pollutants and secondary pollutants can be more dangerous. The first are those that are emitted directly from a source, which can be natural (volcanic eruptions or fires, for example) or of anthropogenic origin (carbon monoxide from vehicles). Secondary pollutants, on the other hand, are not emitted directly
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which is more harmful primary or secondary pollutants ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers