Genetic screening for some diseases already exists - children are tested for PKU at birth. It is conceivable that the number and scope of testing of newborns may broaden in the future. Do you think that newborns should be tested for other traits, such as alcoholism, heart problems, or even intelligence? If tests can be performed on a newborn or even an adult, who has the right to your genetic information - do employers, do spouses, and do insurance companies have the right to your profile. Defend your position

Question

Biology

Mateo

31 May, 11:53

Genetic screening for some diseases already exists - children are tested for PKU at birth. It is conceivable that the number and scope of testing of newborns may broaden in the future. Do you think that newborns should be tested for other traits, such as alcoholism, heart problems, or even intelligence? If tests can be performed on a newborn or even an adult, who has the right to your genetic information - do employers, do spouses, and do insurance companies have the right to your profile. Defend your position

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Josue Allison · Answer 1

Genetic screening should be made cautiously by applying regulatory policies to limit its extension because unscrupulous companies may use this information with eugenic purposes, i. e., to select a priori persons that have less chance of suffering diseases, then excluding people for genetical reasons