Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change?
Animals do not have time to adapt.
Animals always die.
Animals always move away and leave the ecosystem with less biodiversity.
All of the above.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change? Animals do not have time to ...” in 📘 Biology if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Select all that apply Erosion: transports rock material deposits rock material eliminates rock material generates new rock material
Answers (1)
The fossil record shows that a type of aquatic arthropod arose 505-440 million years ago and is now extinct. which of today's animals might that ancient organism most resemble?
Answers (2)
Shaded individuals in this pedigree express a particular trait based on this pedigree what is the mode of inheritance of the trait
Answers (1)
Dehydration synthesis definition
Answers (1)
Can the corona virus be cured
Answers (2)
New Questions in Biology
What species of hominids lived on the planet at the same time as Homo sapiens?
Answers (1)
Genetic screening involves A. climate monitoring B. trait analysis C. Protecting the environment D. Manipulating DNA
Answers (1)
Primates are distinguished from other mammals by having: A. longer pregnancies & periods of infant dependency. B. aquatic capabilities. C. shorter periods of dependence on parents. D. giving birth to live young
Answers (2)
Short reflexes of digestion involve the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves. a. True b. False
Answers (1)
The neuron and muscle fiber membranes do not actually touch but are separated by a fluid-filled gap
Answers (1)