According to the article, why is it that once witnesses state information as a fact or identify a person as the perpetrator, the witnesses are usually unwilling or unable to change their understanding of the situation, even after they are provided proof that their account is inaccurate? based on what you learned in the article, explain why jurors should consider eyewitness testimonies carefully during a trial. (site 2)

Question

Business

Missy

21 April, 13:10

According to the article, why is it that once witnesses state information as a fact or identify a person as the perpetrator, the witnesses are usually unwilling or unable to change their understanding of the situation, even after they are provided proof that their account is inaccurate? based on what you learned in the article, explain why jurors should consider eyewitness testimonies carefully during a trial. (site 2)

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Adyson · Answer 1

they are not ready to change their mind or ready to accept the fault even an evidence is shown. inclusion of wrong clue will alter their perception and made them as fake eye witness. so the jurors should consider eyewitness testimonies carefully during a trial.