Ask Question
17 October, 22:48

Discussions of value claims are generally less emotionally laden than discussions of classification claims.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 17 October, 22:56
    0
    I think the statement is false. Value claims are based on tastes and morals or what is good and bad while classification claims are based on facts or definitions or the existence of something. An argument on value claims would be more emotional since this would dwell on a person’s perspectives about a matter while arguments on classification claims would simply be proving which side is telling the factual answer.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Discussions of value claims are generally less emotionally laden than discussions of classification claims. ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers