Why does a more participative management style ("tipping the pyramid over") lead to greater responsiveness to customers' needs, increased accountability, and more innovative solutions to challenges than a hierarchical "command and control" structure? What particular factors do you believe led UGG/AU to be pioneers in ERM? Was it industry/company/history/circumstances? Was it a changed organizational "culture"? Was it good management?

Question

Business

Casey Friedman

12 February, 15:47

Why does a more participative management style ("tipping the pyramid over") lead to greater responsiveness to customers' needs, increased accountability, and more innovative solutions to challenges than a hierarchical "command and control" structure? What particular factors do you believe led UGG/AU to be pioneers in ERM? Was it industry/company/history/circumstances? Was it a changed organizational "culture"? Was it good management?

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Opie · Answer 1

For example, for inclusive companies, including people with a certain disability is successful to the extent that a change in company culture is achieved. The most complicated obstacles to hiring people with a certain disability are in the myths and barriers that have been raised regarding what has to do with disability.

Explanation:

The hiring of people with disabilities is a step towards breaking down myths and barriers. This must be followed by a systematic step of training and sensitization of all company personnel. Everyone's participation in the different phases of the inclusion process is essential. Said participation must produce as a result of direct executive direction, coming from the highest levels of the company, but generated as the product of training, conviction and awareness.