Steve was wrongfully terminated by Sam, his former boss at Big Flop, Inc., falsely stating that Steve embezzled money. When Steve was asked why he was no longer employed at Big Flop, Steve had to tell his new prospective employer. Under this scenario, regarding a possible claim of defamation, in a state that recognizes compelled self-publication, Sam and Big Flop

(A) are not liable since they are protected under the law.

(B) are not liable even though they lied because it was their opinion.

(c) are not liable because Steve did not have any injury to his reputation.

(D) are likely liable under the theory of compelled self-publication.

Question

Business

Killian

14 January, 11:49

Steve was wrongfully terminated by Sam, his former boss at Big Flop, Inc., falsely stating that Steve embezzled money. When Steve was asked why he was no longer employed at Big Flop, Steve had to tell his new prospective employer. Under this scenario, regarding a possible claim of defamation, in a state that recognizes compelled self-publication, Sam and Big Flop

(A) are not liable since they are protected under the law.

(B) are not liable even though they lied because it was their opinion.

(c) are not liable because Steve did not have any injury to his reputation.

(D) are likely liable under the theory of compelled self-publication.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Alyssa Matthews · Answer 1

(D) are likely liable under the theory of compelled self-publication.

Explanation:

Under the defamation cause of action, courts protect an individual's interest in his reputation by holding liable the maker of false statements (be it the previous employer) that damage the individual (employee) 's reputation.