Parc hired Glaze to remodel and furnish an office suite. Glaze submitted plans that Parc approved. After completing all the necessary construction and painting, Glaze purchased minor accessories that Parc rejected because they did not conform to the plans. Parc refused to allow Glaze to complete the project and refused to pay Glaze any part of the contract price. Glaze sued for the value of the work performed. Which of the following statements is correct?1. Glaze will lose because Glaze breached the contract by not completing performance. 2. Glaze will win because Glaze substantially performed and Parc prevented complete performance. 3. Glaze will lose because Glaze materially breached the contract by buying the accessories. 4. Glaze will win because Parc committed anticipatory breach.

From the information given about the contract and its execution between the two parties involved (That is, Parc and Glaze), the option 2 is most likely.

2. Glaze will win because Glaze substantially performed and Parc prevented complete performance.

Explanation:

It is stated that Glaze was hired to remodel and furnish an office suite, after a submitted plans by Glaze were approved by Parc. It was further stated that the construction and painting had been done.

Although, with Glaze purchasing minor accessories which Parc rejected because they did not conform to the plans is a breach of contract, but that can be corrected by calling Glaze to order. However, it was Parc that refused to allow Glaze to make necessary corretion and complete the project and also refused to pay Glaze any part of the contract price.