Ask Question
2 March, 14:05

In one hour. Sue can produce 70 caps or 21 jackets and Tessa can produce 50 caps or 25 jackets. Sue's opportunity cost of producing a cap is jackets and Tessa's opportunity cost of producing a cap is has a comparative advantage in producing caps. If Sue and Tessa each specialize in producing the good in which they have a comparative advantage. 0.3; 0.50; Tessa; Tessa gains hut Sue loses 3.3; 2.0; Tessa; both Sue and Tessa gain 0.3; 0.50; Sue; both Sue and Tessa gain 3.3; 2.0; Sue; Sue loses but Tessa gains 0.3; 0.50; Sue; Tessa gains but Sue loses jackets.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 2 March, 17:14
    0
    both Sue and Tessa gain 0.3; 0.50

    Explanation:

    Sue's production possibilities frontier:

    70 caps 21 jackets

    Sue's opportunity cost:

    opportunity cost of producing caps = 21 / 70 = 0.3 jackets opportunity cost of producing jackets = 70/21 = 3.33 caps

    Tessa's production possibilities frontier:

    50 caps 25 jackets

    Tessa's opportunity cost:

    opportunity cost of producing caps = 25 / 50 = 0.5 jackets opportunity cost of producing jackets = 50/25 = 2 caps

    Sue should produce caps and Tessa jackets:

    total production = 70 caps (Sue) + 25 jackets (Tessa), if they trade they will both win because each specialized in producing the good in which they have a comparative advantage (lower opportunity costs). If Sue traded and received 21 jackets, she would still have 28 caps left. If Tessa traded and received 50 caps, she would still have 10 jackets left.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In one hour. Sue can produce 70 caps or 21 jackets and Tessa can produce 50 caps or 25 jackets. Sue's opportunity cost of producing a cap ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers