Ask Question
11 December, 00:37

Assume that instead of cleaning a drain with the drain cleaner, Zhao had attempted to use the cleaner to remove a stubborn stain from his hands, causing extreme burns and loss of feeling in his fingers. Zhao sues the manufacturer for inadequate warnings, alleging that the product should have clearly stated that it was not for use on skin.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 11 December, 04:32
    0
    A court would rule in Zhao's favor.

    Explanation:

    First of all, the court must first determine if Zhao's use of the cleaner was a foreseeable misuse of their product. Personally, if you see a bottle only labeled cleaner, it is possible to believe that it can be used to clean stains on your clothes or hands. A warning labeling that the cleaner was no suitable for hands could have prevented this accident. So, the cleaner manufacturer is liable for not putting a warning label.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Assume that instead of cleaning a drain with the drain cleaner, Zhao had attempted to use the cleaner to remove a stubborn stain from his ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers