Ask Question
23 September, 01:24

Smith's operating cash flows in millions were $100, $150, $80 during the past three years; while Jones' operating cash flows in millions were $105, $115, $110 during the same period. From the perspective of operating cash flows, which company would likely be perceived as riskier?

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 23 September, 05:04
    0
    Smith

    Explanation:

    Cash flow at risk (CFaR) can be defined as the extent to which future cash flows may fall short of expectations as a consequence of changes in market variables ... It generally focuses on the market risk that impacts the corporate's cash flows, ignoring things such as political, operational, environmental and legal risk
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Smith's operating cash flows in millions were $100, $150, $80 during the past three years; while Jones' operating cash flows in millions ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers