Ask Question
14 February, 21:44

Suppose that an investor is considering three alternative strategies: conservative, neutral, or aggressive. If economic conditions get better, then the strategies will return, respectively, 6%, 12%, and 20%. If economic conditions get worse, then the strategies will return, respectively, 4%, 2%, and - 8%. If better economic conditions has a probability of only 25%, then using the expected value criterion which alternative would the investor select?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 15 February, 00:28
    0
    The answer is: Following the expected value criterion the investor should choose indistinctively between the conservative or neutral alternatives.

    Explanation:

    The formula we use to calculate the expected return value of the different alternatives is:

    ERV = ∑ (expected return x probability of occurrence)

    The conservative alternative has an expected return value of of 4.5%

    ERV Conservative = (6% x 25%) + (4% x 75%) = 4.5%

    The neutral alternative also has an expected return value of of 4.5%

    ERV Neutral = (12% x 25%) + (4% x 75%) = 4.5%

    The aggressive alternative has an expected return value of of - 1%

    ERV Aggressive = (20% x 25%) + (-8% x 75%) = - 1%
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Suppose that an investor is considering three alternative strategies: conservative, neutral, or aggressive. If economic conditions get ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers