3. Under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act, a plaintiff must prove that the plaintiff owns a mark that is distinctive; the defendant has begun using a mark that is the famous mark; the similarity between the defendant's mark and the famous mark gives rise to a (n) between the marks; and this is likely to the distinctiveness of the famous mark or harm to its.

Question

Business

Kasen Brennan

14 August, 17:17

3. Under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act, a plaintiff must prove that the plaintiff owns a mark that is distinctive; the defendant has begun using a mark that is the famous mark; the similarity between the defendant's mark and the famous mark gives rise to a (n) between the marks; and this is likely to the distinctiveness of the famous mark or harm to its.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Rebecca Perry · Answer 1

Answer: All of the given statements are correct

Explanation:

Trademark Dilution Revision Act came into existence in year 2006 and was ratified by President Bush and thus immediately was implemented and effective. It was designed in order to protect the marks from uses of that blur in the distinctiveness or tarnish the reputation. It tends to clarify, and in other respects the expands, rights of the owners of some famous marks and thus equips them with the better succeed in the dilution actions.