Ask Question
27 October, 07:29

Suppose that you have an option to hire a consultant who has the ability to predict the future with 100 percent accuracy. Using the consultant's reliable recommendations, you found that the expected value with perfect information is equal to $200. Without the consultant's insights you determined the EMV to be equal to $175. Would you pay the consultant $30 for her service? Why or why not? 0 a. Yes, because EVP1 is $30.

b. No, because EVPI is $30.

c. Yes, because expected value with perfect information is higher than the consultant's fee.

d. No, because EVPI is $25, which is less than the consultant's fee of $30

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 27 October, 09:01
    0
    correct option is d. No, because EVPI is $25, which is less than the consultant's fee of $30

    Explanation:

    given data

    accuracy = 100 %

    perfect information = $200

    EMV = $175

    to find out

    Expected Value of perfect Information

    solution

    we know that Expected Value of perfect Information (EVPI) is the maximum that needs to be paid to obtain perfect information

    so

    Expected value of perfect information = perfect information - EMV ... 1

    put here value we get

    Expected value of perfect information = $200 - $175

    Expected value of perfect information = $25

    so correct option is d. No, because EVPI is $25, which is less than the consultant's fee of $30
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Suppose that you have an option to hire a consultant who has the ability to predict the future with 100 percent accuracy. Using the ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers