After reviewing the CCACC's latest document, Oxford Cereals has released SecondAnalysis. pdf, a press kit that Oxford Cereals has assembled to refute the claim that it is guilty of using selective data. Review the Oxford Cereals press kit and then answer the following questions:c. Does Oxford Cereals have a legitimate argument? Why or why not? d. Assuming that the samples Oxford Cereals has posted were randomly selected, perform the appropriate analysis to resolve the ongoing weight dispute. e. What conclusions can you reach from your results? If you were called as an expert witness, would you support the claims of the CCACC or the claims of Oxford Cereals? Explain.

Oxford cereals don't have legitimate contention on the grounds that in the subsequent examination too, organization utilized the items from the industrial facility as it were. It is extremely simple to control the item and its amount at production line level. To have a legitimate and solid contention, it ought to have chosen the examples from any irregular general store (after the item has gone through different worth chain)

2. It ought to be discovered that result of which cluster was utilized by the gathering for its claim. further, in light of the information accessible, it ought to be found if there was some blunder in that group

3. As an observer, I would like to take tests from showcase store rather that manufacturing plant.