Orange County, New York, deeded two lots to Josclynne and Harriet Grier. At the time of the execution of the deeds, all the parties believed that Orange County owned the property. When it later turned out that the county did not own the lots, the county asked the court to vacate the deeds. How should the court rule on the case?

Question

Business

Carmen Tran

25 May, 11:25

Orange County, New York, deeded two lots to Josclynne and Harriet Grier. At the time of the execution of the deeds, all the parties believed that Orange County owned the property. When it later turned out that the county did not own the lots, the county asked the court to vacate the deeds. How should the court rule on the case?

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Kira Cervantes · Answer 1

Answer and Explanation:

In this case, company Orange has committed fraud with two parties Josclynne and Harriet Grier. It is because company Orange has concealed the material fact that it did not own the property, which was sold to Josclynne and Harriet Grier as per the agreement.

The court will declare this agreement void and take all the necessary actions to put Josclynne and Harriet Grier under the condition as it was before the execution of the contract.