Ask Question
27 February, 23:01

James Krieg has finished law school but has unsuccessfully taken the bar exam twice. Krieg is running low on patience and cash. He has begun writing wills to see him through this time of crisis and is charging $200 per will. Some of his will clients have refused to pay Krieg, and he wishes to take them to a small claims court. Which of the following statements is true?

a. Krieg could recover the fees since the licensing after the bar exam is simply to raise funds.

b. Krieg's agreements are void. c. Krieg could recover the fees on a quasi-contract theory.

d. Krieg's agreements are voidable.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 28 February, 01:44
    0
    B. Krieg's agreements are void

    Explanation:

    The bar examination, is the examination that is administered by a jurisdiction's bar association that a lawyer needs to pass before being admitted to the bar of that jurisdiction.

    It is the Examination that Lawyers need to pass before they can be given license to practice law in a jurisdiction.

    Since Kreig is yet to write his Bar Examination successfully, whatever documents he writes and signs as a Lawyer is void, because, he doesn't have the right to practice law in his Jurisdiction yet.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “James Krieg has finished law school but has unsuccessfully taken the bar exam twice. Krieg is running low on patience and cash. He has ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers