Ask Question
1 June, 22:59

Artur, who has a disability, is an employee of banquet & event facilities & services, inc. after the installation of new doors on the entrance to banquet's hall, artur finds it nearly impossible to enter and exit. for repeatedly failing to be on time, banquet replaces artur with carter, who does not have a disability.

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 2 June, 00:09
    0
    Hi your question is incomplete here is the complete question

    Artur, who has a disability, is an employee of banquet & event facilities & services, inc. after the installation of new doors on the entrance to banquet's hall, artur finds it nearly impossible to enter and exit. for repeatedly failing to be on time, banquet replaces Arthur with carter, who does not have a disability.

    Refer to Fact Pattern 18-2. To successfully defend against Artur's claim, Banquet will have to show that:"

    Answer : Banquet cannot make changes to the door without undue hardship to Arthur

    Explanation:

    The explanation given by Banquet and event facility for replacing Arthur was that they cannot change the doors of the hall without undue hard been meted out on Arthur. and they have to change the doors of the Banquet's hall entrance, therefore to reduce the hardship and stress on Arthur they would have to replace him Carter

    This reason is very reasonable and acceptable because the condition of service an employee and the safety of an employee is very important.
  2. 2 June, 02:36
    0
    Incomplete question. Here's the full part of the question:

    *Artur, who has a disability, is an employee of banquet & event facilities & services, inc. after the installation of new doors on the entrance to banquet's hall, artur finds it nearly impossible to enter and exit. for repeatedly failing to be on time, banquet replaces artur with carter, who does not have a disability.

    Refer to Fact Pattern 18-2. To successfully defend against Artur's claim, Banquet will have to show that:"

    Answer:

    Banquet cannot make changes to the doors without undue hardship to Artur

    Explanation:

    Their defense is only reasonable if they claim that it acted in the best interest of Artur to replace him since it cannot make changes to the doors without causing him undue hardship because of his disability. Thus the decision was taken to avoid putting him under immense stress.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Artur, who has a disability, is an employee of banquet & event facilities & services, inc. after the installation of new doors on the ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers