Ask Question
8 November, 09:56

Henry Crouch's law office has traditionally ordered ink refills 50 units at a time. The firm estimates that camying cost is 40% of the S unit cost and that annual demand is about 235 units per year The assumptions of the basic EOQ model are thought to apply. For what value of ordering cost would its action be optimal? a For what value of ordering cost would its action be optimal? Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of per order round your response to two decimal places) b) If the true ordering cost turns out to be much greater greater than your answer to part (a), what is the impact on the firm's ordering policy? A. The order quantity should be decreased decreased. B. The order quantity should not be changed. C. The order quantity should be increased increased.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 8 November, 10:43
    0
    Ordering cost = $23.40

    C. The order quantity should be increased increased.

    Explanation:

    As per the data given in the question,

    Number of units = 50

    Camying cost = 40% of S 11 unit cost

    = 40% * 11 = $4.4

    Annual demand = 235 units per year

    As per the following formula,

    a)

    Quantity = (2 * Annual demand * ordering cost : camying cost) ^1/2

    50 = (2 * 235 * S : 4.4) ^1/2

    S = 50^2 * 4.4 : (2 * 235)

    = $23.40

    b)

    Let S be $50

    Quantity = ((2 * 235 * 50) : 4.4) ^1/2

    = 73.08

    = 73 units

    So, the order quantity increased with the price.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Henry Crouch's law office has traditionally ordered ink refills 50 units at a time. The firm estimates that camying cost is 40% of the S ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers