In Florence Cement Company v. Vittraino, Florence sought to pierce Shelby's corporate veil and hold the principals personally liable by claiming Shelby mixed personal and business transactions and had engaged in fraud in a loan application. The appeals court held that
A) the veil could be pierced.
B) Shelby was liable for the $114,557 owed to Florence.
C) Florence had an opportunity to mitigate damages.
D) piercing the corporate veil was not warranted
+3
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In Florence Cement Company v. Vittraino, Florence sought to pierce Shelby's corporate veil and hold the principals personally liable by ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Home » Business » In Florence Cement Company v. Vittraino, Florence sought to pierce Shelby's corporate veil and hold the principals personally liable by claiming Shelby mixed personal and business transactions and had engaged in fraud in a loan application.