Ask Question
30 October, 15:58

Extracts from cost information of Hebar Corp.:Simple L3 Pack Complex L7 Pack Total Setup cost allocated using direct labor-hours $19,250 $5,750 $25,000 Setup cost allocated using setup-hours $13,400 $11,600 $25,000 Assuming that setup-hours is considered a more effective cost drive for allocating setup costs than direct labor-hours.

1. Which of the following statements is true of Hebar's setup costs under traditional costing? A. L7 pack is undercosted by $5,750B. L3 pack is overcosted by $5,850C. L3 pack is undercosted by $5,850D. L7 pack is overcosted by $5,850

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 30 October, 18:53
    0
    The correct answer is option (B).

    Explanation:

    According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows:

    First we calculate for L3 pack.

    Setup cost = cost allocated using direct labor-hours - Setup cost allocated using setup-hours

    By putting the value in the formula, we get

    Setup cost = $19,250 - $13,400

    = $5,850 (Positive shows over costed)

    So, L3 pack is overcosted by $5,850
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Extracts from cost information of Hebar Corp.:Simple L3 Pack Complex L7 Pack Total Setup cost allocated using direct labor-hours $19,250 ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers