Ask Question
10 November, 12:07

A congress woman from a state with several ball-bearing factories explains that it is necessary to impose trade restrictions, such as a tariff, on the ball-bearing industry to protect workers in the domestic ball-bearing industry. The congress woman claims that without trade protection, there will be layoffs, causing many U. S. workers in the ball-bearing industry to become unemployed. Which of the following Justifications is the president using to argue for the trade restriction on ball bearings? a. Unfair-competition argument b. Infant-industry argument c. Jobs argument d. National-security argument e. Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 10 November, 15:09
    0
    C. Jobs argument

    Explanation:

    The job preservation argument is brought up by unions to look out for union jobs.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A congress woman from a state with several ball-bearing factories explains that it is necessary to impose trade restrictions, such as a ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers