Ask Question
22 November, 04:46

When Harriet went away for the summer, Landry, a house painter, painted her house. He had a contract to paint a neighbor’s house but painted Harriet’s house by mistake. When Harriet returned from vacation, Landry billed her for $3,100, which was a fair price for the work. She refused to pay. Landry claimed that she had a quasi-contractual liability for that amount. Was he correct?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 22 November, 08:39
    0
    No, Because Harriet had no knowledge of the painting for her house, While there was an added benefit. There is no quasi-contract at all.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “When Harriet went away for the summer, Landry, a house painter, painted her house. He had a contract to paint a neighbor’s house but ...” in 📘 Business if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers