Chemistry

Gaige Campbell

5 May, 11:57

What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck?

A. Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do.

B. The idea of mutation was understood by both but, Darwin could not prove it.

C. Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do.

D. The idea of mutation was understood by both but, Lamarck could not prove it

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question ✅ “What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? A. Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do. B. ...” in 📘 Chemistry if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

How can a dominant gene and a recessive gene, affect the offsprings genes

Bread is made with which fungus? morel yeast mold chytrid

What happens to the equilibrium if the pressure is increased?

You decide to mix up a pitcher of tea. You put water, tea, sugar and lemons in a pitcher and stir it up. How do you decide if you just created a mixture or a compound?

What is the formula for tons to meters

New Questions in Chemistry

Which phrase describes an atom

How many moles of NH3 are in 0.250 L of a 5.00 M aqueous solution?

There are different types of bonds based on electronegativity. One bond type is known as non-polar covalent. Which choice below has this bond type? A. all of the compounds B. H2 C. H2O D. NaCl

What normally determines whether a substance is a liquid, solid, gas, or plasma?

Which atoms from an ionic bond