Why are condition variables considered more ""efficient"" than monitors? Is it possible that they might be less efficient than monitors?

Answer and Explanation:

Condition variables are a methods for obstructing a string until some condition has been fulfilled. When viewed in isolation, a condition variable enables strings to square and to be woken by different strings. In any case, condition factors are intended to be utilized with a particular goal in mind; a condition variable interfaces with a mutex to make it simple to sit tight for a self-assertive condition on state ensured by the mutex. Chrome's C+ + condition factors have type Condition Variable. Therefore, these variables are more productive than monitors.

There is a possibility that conditional variables are less effective than screens or monitors.

In the concurrent programming, a screen is a synchronization built-up that enables strings to have both shared rejection and the capacity to pause (obstruct) for a specific condition to turn out to be valid. Screens additionally have an instrument for flagging different strings that their condition has been met. A screen (monitor) comprises of a mutex (lock) article and condition factors. A condition variable is fundamentally a holder of strings that are looking out for a specific condition. Screens give a system to strings to incidentally surrender select access so as to hang tight for some condition to be met, before recapturing restrictive access and continuing their errand.