Ask Question
5 August, 16:22

After Hurricane Katrina there was considerable public outrage that many of the properties were not insured against flooding although they were insured against wind damage. What might explain these different approaches to insurance? A. Predatory insurance policies. B. The risk of flood damage is potentially diversifiable but the risk of wind damage is not. C. The risk of wind damage is potentially diversifiable but the risk of flooding is not. D. Neither the risk of wind damage or the risk of flooding is diversifiable.

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 5 August, 18:42
    0
    I would say B is the answer
  2. 5 August, 19:07
    0
    Indeed, B is the answer
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “After Hurricane Katrina there was considerable public outrage that many of the properties were not insured against flooding although they ...” in 📘 Engineering if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers