Medical Investigator: "Podiatrists initially assumed that Meyer's Rash, an itchy rash between the toes, was a fungal infection similar to athlete's foot. At first, only Dr. Pannikar argued that Meyer's Rash was viral in nature. All anti-fungal medications proved utterly ineffective in addressing Meyer's Rash. Now, recent antibody studies seem to suggest, quite surprisingly, that Meyer's Rash is caused by a virus."

In the medical investigator's argument, the portion in boldface plays

Question

English

Roman Newton

19 April, 22:10

Medical Investigator: "Podiatrists initially assumed that Meyer's Rash, an itchy rash between the toes, was a fungal infection similar to athlete's foot. At first, only Dr. Pannikar argued that Meyer's Rash was viral in nature. All anti-fungal medications proved utterly ineffective in addressing Meyer's Rash. Now, recent antibody studies seem to suggest, quite surprisingly, that Meyer's Rash is caused by a virus."

In the medical investigator's argument, the portion in boldface plays

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

June Ritter · Answer 1

In the medical investigator's argument, this portion:

At first, only Dr. Pannikar argued that Meyer's Rash was viral in nature.

Presents an explanation that the argument concludes is correct.

Explanation:

This is the correct answer as at the time, Dr, Pannikar was the only one giving this explanation, but lately the main conclusion was proven by science.

This judgment does not oppose the argument.

It is not a finding, it is an explanation itself.

It does not provide evidence though, it is only an explanation but it is part of the main conclusion of the argument.