Based on the details from the book, what is the best conclusion about how James Cross Giblin views the quest to unlock the riddle of the Rosetta Stone? He views Champollion's work as important but does not think earlier scholars' work was important.

He views the work of all the scholars as important steps that led to Champollion's discovery.

He views the work of all the scholars who tried to translate the Rosetta Stone as unimportant.

He views de Sacy's work as logical but does not view Champollion's work as logical.

Question

English

Kassidy

12 August, 09:13

Based on the details from the book, what is the best conclusion about how James Cross Giblin views the quest to unlock the riddle of the Rosetta Stone? He views Champollion's work as important but does not think earlier scholars' work was important.

He views the work of all the scholars as important steps that led to Champollion's discovery.

He views the work of all the scholars who tried to translate the Rosetta Stone as unimportant.

He views de Sacy's work as logical but does not view Champollion's work as logical.

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Yair Richmond · Answer 1

He views the work of all the scholars as important steps that led to Champollion's discovery.

Explanation:

This is the statement that best describes the view that James Cross Giblin has when it comes to the quest to unlock the riddle of the Rosetta Stone. In this text, Giblin describes the many different discoveries and contributions that were necessary for the Rosetta Stone to be deciphered. His use of words demonstrates that he believes all scholars to have been important in the completion of this quest.