Leon is evaluating whether a podcast about raising the legal driving age is a reliable resource. Which fact about the podcast would cause him to decide that it is an unreliable source?

The podcast does not have many listeners.

The podcast hosts work in law enforcement.

The podcast hosts do not provide resources for their facts.

The podcast does not agree with Leon's stance on the issue.

The podcast hosts do not provide resources for their facts.

Explanation:

In any case of determining the reliability of a source, it is pertinent that the given information is passed after the facts are checked for any discrepancy. Reliable sources make it trustworthy, thus leading to more faith in the source.

If Leon looks into how the information about the driving age is got and then shared through the podcast, he should make sure that the host of the podcast also mention the resources he / his people use to get their information. So, when the host do not provide any of the resources for how they got their facts, it will be easy for Leon to decide that he podcast is an unreliable source.

The podcast hosts do not provide resources for their facts ... this is because unless they are specifically saying a source then they could've gotten their information from anywhere or even just made it up