Ask Question
23 May, 10:09

Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this

story was written for children?

The story is set in a forest.

The battle was won by a trick.

The excerpt describes a battle.

The characters are talking animals.

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 23 May, 12:14
    0
    The characters are talking animals
  2. 23 May, 12:59
    0
    The characters are talking animals. Any other option would be logical and easy to explain, but talking animals don't exist unless you consider a parrot. Nonetheless, the other options are logical and realistic while the last option is not at all realistic. Most children's books are not realistic.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this story was written for children? The story is set in a forest. The battle was won by a ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers