Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this

story was written for children?

The story is set in a forest.

The battle was won by a trick.

The excerpt describes a battle.

The characters are talking animals.

Question

English

Edith Bonilla

23 May, 10:09

Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this

story was written for children?

The story is set in a forest.

The battle was won by a trick.

The excerpt describes a battle.

The characters are talking animals.

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Clare Kemp · Answer 1

The characters are talking animals

Mckayla Santos · Answer 2

The characters are talking animals. Any other option would be logical and easy to explain, but talking animals don't exist unless you consider a parrot. Nonetheless, the other options are logical and realistic while the last option is not at all realistic. Most children's books are not realistic.

Which evidence best supports the conclusion that thisstory was written for children?The story is set in a forest.The battle was won by a trick.The excerpt describes a battle.The characters are talking animals.

Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this

story was written for children?

The story is set in a forest.

The battle was won by a trick.

The excerpt describes a battle.

The characters are talking animals.