Ask Question
8 August, 06:40

Read the passage.

Bike lanes are meant to protect cyclists, not to provoke them. Adding bike lanes to South Drive was a way to separate cars and bikes to keep cyclists safe. The two-lane road was dangerous. But the bike lane has made things worse. Now cars are stuck in a single lane. Traffic is a mess, and cars are veering into bike lanes. Bikes are jumping curbs to avoid getting hit by turning cars. Did the city planners lose their tape measures?

Which statement best summarizes a reason in support of the claim that adding a bicycle lane to the two-lane road was poorly planned?

Bike lanes are separate from car lanes.

The city planners created a two-lane road.

Bike lanes have made traffic problems worse.

The two-lane road was dangerous for cyclists.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 8 August, 07:30
    0
    c

    Explanation:; )
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Read the passage. Bike lanes are meant to protect cyclists, not to provoke them. Adding bike lanes to South Drive was a way to separate ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers