How does the characterization of Squealer support the author's purpose? Squealer's dramatic accusations draw parallels between him and Stalin's propagandists. Squealer's uncertainty shows that he is not a reliable ally of Napoleon and is ineffective with messaging. Squealer's ability to get the animals to listen to him shows that any animal can rise to be a leader in time. Squealer's humble interactions with the animals reflect the importance of equality and cooperation.

Question

English

Monteen

1 January, 18:39

How does the characterization of Squealer support the author's purpose? Squealer's dramatic accusations draw parallels between him and Stalin's propagandists. Squealer's uncertainty shows that he is not a reliable ally of Napoleon and is ineffective with messaging. Squealer's ability to get the animals to listen to him shows that any animal can rise to be a leader in time. Squealer's humble interactions with the animals reflect the importance of equality and cooperation.

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Sanford · Answer 1

Squealer's dramatic accusations draw parallels between him and Stalin's propagandists.

Explanation: A

Genie · Answer 2

The correct answer is "Squealer's dramatic accusations draw parallels between him and Stalin's propagandists."

The author's purpose was to explore how mass media can be used to manipulate people. Squealer is loyal to his leader, spreads false information, and uses many tactics to justify Napoleon's policies, similar to Stalin's propagandists.