I thought I could outrun my grief, but looking back now, I

see it had followed me everywhere. It was there in Boston.

It was there in Amarillo and in Seattle. It was even here in

Charlotte. I carried it with me like an overstuffed backpack.

How does the author's use of parallelism most clearly support the central

idea?

A. It makes readers consider how grief affected the speaker in each

town.

B. It calls attention to the similarities between grief and a backpack

because it was so overstuffed.

C. It illustrates how the grief is like a backpack because the speaker

carried it with him everywhere.

D. It emphasizes the number of places the speaker's grief followed

him.

Question

English

Guest

30 December, 04:09

I thought I could outrun my grief, but looking back now, I

see it had followed me everywhere. It was there in Boston.

It was there in Amarillo and in Seattle. It was even here in

Charlotte. I carried it with me like an overstuffed backpack.

How does the author's use of parallelism most clearly support the central

idea?

A. It makes readers consider how grief affected the speaker in each

town.

B. It calls attention to the similarities between grief and a backpack

because it was so overstuffed.

C. It illustrates how the grief is like a backpack because the speaker

carried it with him everywhere.

D. It emphasizes the number of places the speaker's grief followed

him.

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Maria Burnett · Answer 1

B. It calls attention to the similarities between grief and a backpack

because it was so overstuffed.

Explanation:

" I carried it with me like an overstuffed backpack." This is used to compare grief to a backpack