Ask Question
22 January, 21:10

Which sentence best serves as an explanation of how

the evidence supports the reason?

O Rainsford did not kill Zaroff in self-defense, but

snuck up on him in his bedroom, where Zaroff

congratulated him on winning

O Rainsford killed Zaroff because he was angry about

being forced to play the game even after winning

Zaroffs statement shows that he admits defeat and

may have let Rainsford go free without a struggle

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 23 January, 00:02
    0
    O Rainsford killed Zaroff because he was angry about being forced to play the game even after winning

    Explanation:

    The first option cannot be it, since it is two pieces of evidence. The third statement also cannot be it, because its explanation is speculation and not for sure fact. This leaves the second option as the answer.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which sentence best serves as an explanation of how the evidence supports the reason? O Rainsford did not kill Zaroff in self-defense, but ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers