Immigrants like Bharati Mukherjee bring about a new perspective of what it means to be an American. Analyze her specific purpose in writing this essay. Provide at least two examples from the text to support your answer of at least 150 words.

The author and her new family moved back to the United States to avoid any race-related provocations that occurred in Canada. After shifting to the United States, Mukherjee turned into a legal citizen of the States. Like a considerable amount of outsiders, she didn't get her citizenship for political or religious reasons. Rather, Mukherjee was a willful national of the United States. Mukerjee considers herself an American, not an Asian-American. Mukherjee proceeds to clarify how America has changed her and how she is changing America, particularly by voting, practicing her miscellaneous rights, and battling the differences. Further, she says that multiculturalism is one of the most indispensable attributes that shaped the accomplishments of the United States.

The author and her new family moved back to the United States to avoid any race-related provocations that occurred in Canada. After shifting to the United States, Mukherjee turned into a legal citizen of the States. Like a considerable amount of outsiders, she didn't get her citizenship for political or religious reasons. Rather, Mukherjee was a willful national of the United States. Mukerjee considers herself an American, not an Asian-American. Mukherjee proceeds to clarify how America has changed her and how she is changing America, particularly by voting, practicing her miscellaneous rights, and battling the differences. Further, she says that multiculturalism is one of the most indispensable attributes that shaped the accomplishments of the United States.

America has extraordinary founding principles if compared to the European countries. It holds onto an idealistic heterogeneity rather than homogeneity. Mukherjee proposes another convention in her text that mocks over "the upheld assimilation of the pot" and "the Canadian paradigm of a multicultural variety". All this detaches distinctive societies and stops people to put the benefit of their country over those ethnic values.

The ' "us" versus them" ' attitude is risky, as talked about in the essay, is another example from the text. These mentions highlight details of brutality against minority gatherings and legitimate workers which are additionally rebuked for social and financial issues. Multiculturalism is discouraged along these lines. Rather, America should consider itself to be a continually evolving "we". Several citizens are changing identities depending on their likelihood.

Mukherjee declines hyphenation since it is demonstrative of the American example, in which white is driven and ethnicity are minor, and she wouldn't like to be underestimated. This has made some Indian Americans criticize her. However, she centers herself around her present rather than her past. A few guardians are vexed that their kids have overlooked traditions of the country yet Mukherjee supposes it is alluring to give youngsters a chance to culturally assimilate and feel comfortable in their new land.

Those Indian Americans who respond to marginalization by converting to be hyper-Indian, she advises to familiarize themselves with the lawful framework of the nation and realize the change that way.

Another line from the text is mentioned below, which would rhyme the lucid idea of the author.

"America changes settlers and they transform America. Arriving at a new location is not failure but expansion."