Ask Question
8 February, 16:47

How can Sharil best adjust her argument based on this new information, while still keeping her claim the same? by going back through her original essay and removing every direct reference to rock climbing or rock walls by not referring to this new information in her argument and instead focusing on what she has already learned by arguing that the increased risk of wrist and ankle injuries should be ignored since it is not a serious problem by recognizing the risks but arguing that students can avoid injuries if they are careful and use the right equipment

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 8 February, 17:37
    0
    but arguing that students can avoid injuries if they are careful and use the right equipment

    Option D.

    Explanation:

    In the first essay that was written Sharil, she claimed that rock climbing should be introduced in her school as a physical activity for the fun and to make bodies do physical exercise.

    But with the new information that she came across about these activities can cause injuries, Sharil said that these injuries could be avoided if students are more careful and use proper equipment.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “How can Sharil best adjust her argument based on this new information, while still keeping her claim the same? by going back through her ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers