How can Sharil best adjust her argument based on this new information, while still keeping her claim the same? by going back through her original essay and removing every direct reference to rock climbing or rock walls by not referring to this new information in her argument and instead focusing on what she has already learned by arguing that the increased risk of wrist and ankle injuries should be ignored since it is not a serious problem by recognizing the risks but arguing that students can avoid injuries if they are careful and use the right equipment

Question

English

Guest

8 February, 16:47

How can Sharil best adjust her argument based on this new information, while still keeping her claim the same? by going back through her original essay and removing every direct reference to rock climbing or rock walls by not referring to this new information in her argument and instead focusing on what she has already learned by arguing that the increased risk of wrist and ankle injuries should be ignored since it is not a serious problem by recognizing the risks but arguing that students can avoid injuries if they are careful and use the right equipment

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Mattie Morse · Answer 1

but arguing that students can avoid injuries if they are careful and use the right equipment

Option D.

Explanation:

In the first essay that was written Sharil, she claimed that rock climbing should be introduced in her school as a physical activity for the fun and to make bodies do physical exercise.

But with the new information that she came across about these activities can cause injuries, Sharil said that these injuries could be avoided if students are more careful and use proper equipment.