Ask Question
20 September, 14:22

Read this passage from Joseph Stalin's radio broadcast from July 3, 1941:

Non-aggression pacts are pacts of peace between two States. It

was such a pact that Germany proposed to us in 1939. Could the

Soviet Government have declined such a proposal? I think that

not a single peace-loving State could decline a peace treaty with

a neighboring State even though the latter was headed by such

fiends and cannibals as Hitler and Ribbentrop.

Which statement makes a reasonable inference about the passage?

O

A. Stalin's need to defend the nonaggression pact shows his wariness of

critics.

O

B. Signing a nonaggression pact, even with cruel dictators, is a good idea.

O

C. The fact that Stalin agreed to the pact means that he actually meant to

break it first.

O

D. Stalin should have known that "fiends" would break a nonaggression

pact.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 20 September, 15:01
    0
    Is this middle school work?
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Read this passage from Joseph Stalin's radio broadcast from July 3, 1941: Non-aggression pacts are pacts of peace between two States. It ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers